Noosha Aubel: biography and office in Potsdam

Noosha Aubel, Dietmar Woidke and Friedrich Merz must be judged on their provision of effective support for children. In the Heidrun case, there are allegations of a lack of childcare support and of misleading the Petitions Committee. Court rulings underscore the need for clarification and lend further weight to the call for Aubel’s immediate resignation.

Potsdam does not need to be a champion at shamefully dragging its feet. The state capital, Potsdam, needs an administration that protects, makes decisions and actually organises help. In the case of two-year-old Heidrun, an examination of the available documents reveals that this is precisely what is lacking: A child with multiple severe disabilities, classified as GdB 100 and care level 4, is unable to make use of an available nursery place because the necessary support is lacking and those responsible at Potsdam City Council are unable to provide evidence of documents allegedly having been delivered – which once again highlights the disastrous handling of important documents under the currently questionable professional and managerial supervision of Lord Mayor Noosha Aubel (50, independent) at Potsdam Town Hall.

Noosha Aubel, Potsdam and an objective, critical assessment: her leadership style and budgetary approach raise the question of whether Potsdam’s mayor is up to the task of tackling the city’s problems.

Noosha Aubel under pressure: This editorial AI illustration addresses the budget crisis in Potsdam, the political pressure to consolidate finances and the growing doubts about the mayor’s leadership

Potsdam’s 10 km/h speed limit scandal: harsh criticism of Noosha Aubel, Rudolf-Breitscheid-Straße, City Hall communications, the SPD, the CDU and the nursery case.

Noosha Aubel and Dietmar Woidke: A young child with profound disabilities and care grade 4 is waiting in Potsdam for a daycare place and one-to-one assistance